Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Anaesthesia, Pain and Intensive Care. 2014; 18 (2): 172-175
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-164440

ABSTRACT

To analyze the rate, the frequency of different indications and the most common indication of cesarean sections in Military Hospital Rawalpindi. Cross sectional study. Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Military Hospital Rawalpindi from September 2011 to February 2012. A total of 3555 pregnant females delivered during study period were enrolled in the study. Health volunteers and the cases of uterine rupture, pregnancy with fetal anomaly, or termination of pregnancy were excluded from the study. All patients were admitted in labor room. Detailed obstetric and gynecological history was taken. Detailed general physical examination and obstetric examination was done. Baseline investigations were checked. Fetal anomalies were ruled out by anomaly scan. Strict fetomaternal monitoring was done during labor. Cervical foley catheter and prostaglandin E2 [Prostin] tablets were used for induction according to Bishop score. Clinical record of all patients, including mode of delivery and indication, was analyzed in terms of percentage and frequency and documented in a special performa after written informed consent. Filled performas were attached with patient's case notes. Patients enrolled in the study over six months were 3555, out of which 1620 [45.5%] were delivered by cesarean section, 1901 [53.4%] were spontaneous vaginal deliveries and 34 [0.9%] were delivered by vaginal birth after cesarean [VBAC]. The rate of cesarean section in our study was 45.5% and the most common factor was repeat cesarean section [44.4%], followed by failed trial of labor [27.1%] and fetal distress seen in 165 [10.1%] cases. The rate of cesarean section in our study was 45.5% and the most common factor was repeat cesarean section 44.4%

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL